Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFPP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: persistent vandalism (scores/result have been altered on multiple occasions) Electricmaster (talk) 07:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP Vandalism, The someone from different IP addresses keep on deleting the text without any reference or data. Umar shahid (talk) 09:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Continued vandalism from a variety of IP addresses. DH85868993 (talk) 09:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hauntbug (talk) 12:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 18:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 20:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected by administrator Sir Sputnik. Favonian (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: ARBCOM protection needed. Several Arbcom reversions have already occurred due to non-EC editors editing a page with a topic they are not allowed to. See the page history for all the reversions and non-EC editors. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: A month or so ago we had a problem where Allan Lichtman told his followers to go edit his pages to remove critical material. He has continued to agitate about Wikipedia and his followers have been reverting the pages in contravention to the talk pages again though I do not know if he said anything about it in the last week. I did my best to remove vandalism or content editing against the talk page consensus and redirect them there, where the issues were resolved months ago. I do not think the pages need full protection, but blocking unregistered users may help, as that seems to be the root of the problem on all "sides" (both critics and support). This is for both his main page and the The Keys to the White House page. As far as I can tell I got it back to where it was before someone started editing everything again but I will check. One of the editors has a user name matching the name of his wife. Caraturane (talk) 21:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I apologize I flipped the pages, the edits are occurring on The Keys to the White House page today, but semi-protecting both is probably most practical given the apparent conflict of interest edits. Caraturane (talk) 21:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi for 48 hours due to instability and edit warring. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Continued targeting by IPs and SPAs (assuming it's all one person) adding serious and oversightable BLP violations. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 21:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Frequent disruptive edits from IP editors and single-purpose accounts that are possibly connected to the subject of the article Helioz9 (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: vandalism CassiJevenn (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High IP of vandalism, adding uncited sources that Valdes will be transfer on GMA Network as a new news chief of GMA Integrated News, even though she already retire as a journalist and news chief of News5, the news and current affairs department of TV5. BeemoKincaid (talk) 00:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. Persistent vandalism on 9/28 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism (section blanking). Amigao (talk) 01:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Semi-protection: persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: unconstrutive edits 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Semi-protection: disruptive editing 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persisent addition of an identical non-constructive trivia edit by multiple accounts: 60.227.221.174, Funify01, and Forggot112. Rift (talk) 04:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of unconstructive edits and IP vandalism in the wake of damage from Helene HelpMyUnbelief (talk) 04:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: this article rapidly abducted by the vandals while the article is in semi-protected layer of restrictions but nothing seem to be impactful due to various radicals involved in such offensive organisation. Helper1.of~Devine (talk) 04:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: CTOPS ARBPIA. Borgenland (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: WP:FORUM and WP:DENY violations by IPs with POV-pushing agendas. Borgenland (talk) 05:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Unprotection: Disruptive edits, and all edits in general actually, are extremely sparse. The 2 most recent disruptive edit were on 6 June and 15 May. Before then would be 29 Feb and 25 Jan. I think the sparse amount of vandalism allows unprotection. TheWikiToby (talk) 19:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Couldn't contact the protecting admin btw (@Samsara) since they've been inactive since 2021. TheWikiToby (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's because it's getting caught in the edit filter. The most recent attempts were in August, and they tried three times in under a minute. The vandalism is not "extremely sparse" just because the filters might be catching some of it. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Semi-protection expires today 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 00:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    That isn't an argument for removing the protection. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.