Jump to content

Section 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Clause 28)

Tagline "Is this Labour's idea of a comprehensive education?" above an image of three books with the titles "Young, Gay and Proud", "Police: Out of School!" and "The playbook for kids about sex"
Conservative Party poster criticising the Labour Party's support for LGBTQ education for the 1987 general election campaign, the year before Section 28 was enacted

Section 28 refers to a part of the Local Government Act 1988, which stated that local authorities in England, Scotland and Wales "shall not intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality" or "promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship[1]". It is sometimes referred to as Clause 28,[2] or as Section 2A in reference to the relevant Scottish legislation.[3]

The legislation came into effect on 24 May 1988[4] during Margaret Thatcher's premiership. It caused many organisations, such as LGBT student support groups to either close, limit their activities or to self-censor.[5] In addition, Section 28 had a widespread impact on schools across the United Kingdom. This was due to uncertainty around what constituted the "promotion" of homosexuality, leading many teachers to avoid discussing the topic in any educational context.[6]

Section 28 was first repealed in Scotland under the Ethical Standards in Public Life etc. (Scotland) Act 2000.[7] It was subsequently repealed in England and Wales in November 2003,[8] following New Labour's initial unsuccessful attempt to repeal the legislation under the Local Government Act 2000.[9]

History

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Homosexuality was decriminalised for men over the age of 21 under the Sexual Offences Act 1967,[10] following recommendations made in the Wolfdenden report in 1957.[11] However, discrimination against gay men, and LGBT people in general, continued in the following decades.

This was exacerbated in 1981,[12] as the first recorded cases of HIV/AIDS were found in five gay men with no previous health issues.[13] The mass media, as well as medical professionals, then associated HIV/AIDS with gay and bisexual men. Although subsequent medical research showed that gay men were not the only people who were susceptible to contracting the virus,[14] the perceived association with HIV/AIDS increased the stigmatisation of gay and bisexual men. This correlated with higher levels of discrimination towards LGBT people.[15] Data from the British Social Attitudes Survey suggests that homophobia peaked in the United Kingdom in 1987, as 75% of the survey’s respondents believed that homosexual activity was "always or mostly wrong.”[16]

Despite growing levels of homophobia in 1980s Britain, several Labour-led councils across the country introduced a range of anti-discrimination policies[17] and provided specialist support services for their LGBT constituents. The Greater London Council also granted funding to a number of LGBT organisations, including the London Lesbian and Gay Community Centre in Islington.[18]

Islington London Borough Council received further attention in 1986, when the Islington Gazette reported that a copy of the children’s book Jenny Lives with Eric and Martin was available in a local school library. The copy found by the Islington Gazette was actually located in an Inner London Education Authority teachers’ resource centre, and there was no evidence to support the newspaper’s claim that it was seen or used by children. However, the book’s portrayal of a young girl living with her father and his male partner provoked widespread outrage from the right-wing press and Conservative politicians.[19] Following this, the 1987 election campaign saw the Conservative Party issue posters attacking the Labour Party for supporting the provision of LGBT education. Jenny Lives with Eric and Martin was referenced frequently in the parliamentary debates that led to the introduction of Section 28.[20]

Legislation

[edit]

Prior to the introduction of Section 28, Conservative politicians began to experience concerns about the future of the nuclear family[21] as fewer people were getting married and divorce rates were increasing.[17] In an attempt to mitigate these fears, the government introduced a clause to the Education (No. 2) Act 1986 which stated that sex education should “encourage … pupils to have due regard to moral considerations and the value of family life”.[22] However, some Conservatives also blamed the perceived decline of the nuclear family on members of the LGBT community.[23] During this time, Conservative backbench MPs such as Jill Knight also believed that schools and Labour-run local authority areas would provide materials that would ‘promote homosexuality’ to children.[9]

Consequently, in 1986, Lord Halsbury first tabled the Local Government Act 1986 (Amendment) Bill,[24] whose long title was An act to refrain local authorities from promoting homosexuality, in the House of Lords. The bill became commonly known as the Earl of Halsbury's Bill. Although it successfully passed both the House of Lords and the first stage in the House of Commons, further attempts to pass the bill were impeded by the 1987 general election and it ultimately did not become law. Its provisions were not reintroduced by the Conservative government following its re-election.

Instead, on 2 December 1987 in committee, Conservative MP David Wilshire proposed an equivalent amendment to the new pending Local Government Bill. Although Viscount Falkland attempted to include a compromise which would make the arts exempt from the proposed legislation, his bid was unsuccessful and the bill passed through to the House of Commons.[9] The bill was ultimately passed under the name of Clause 28, and became law on 24 May 1988.

Controversy over applicability

[edit]

As the Education (No. 2) Act 1986 gave school governors increased powers over the delivery of sex education, and Local Education Authorities no longer retained control over this, it has been argued that Section 28 was a redundant piece of legislation.[21] Section 28 was heavily influential in spite of this, and many of its opponents campaigned for its abolition as "a symbolic measure against intolerance."[25]

In response to widespread uncertainty about what the legislation permitted, including a common misconception that teachers were banned from discussing homosexuality with their students,[26] the National Union of Teachers released a statement to try to provide clarity for its members. The statement asserted that the legislation restricted “the ability of local authorities to support schools in respect of learning and educating for equality”, had an adverse impact on schemes designed to curb discrimination and made “it difficult for schools to prevent or address the serious problems that arise from homophobic bullying."[27] A government circular also stated that Section 28 would “not prevent the objective discussion of homosexuality in the classroom, nor the counselling of pupils concerned about their sexuality."[28] This contributed to further confusion around what was permitted under Section 28, with Jill Knight asserting that the aim of Section 28 “was to protect children in schools from having homosexuality thrust upon them."[29]

Both the Education Act 1996 and the Learning and Skills Act 2000 reduced Section 28’s impact on sex education policy prior to its repeal, as the Secretary of State for Education solely regulated the delivery of sex education in England and Wales under these policies. However, the policy continued to have a significant impact on LGBT inequality across Britain.

Prosecutions and complaints

[edit]

No local authorities were successfully prosecuted under Section 28.[6] However, there were legal attempts to use it to stop the funding of LGBT and HIV/AIDS prevention initiatives.

In May 2000, Glasgow resident Sheena Strain took Glasgow City Council to the Court of Session, with support from the Christian Institute. Strain objected to her council tax being used for what she viewed as the promotion of homosexuality. She particularly took issue with the provision of funding to the Scottish HIV/AIDS awareness organisation PHACE West, which produced and distributed a safe sex guide named ‘Gay Sex Now.’ Strain claimed that the guide was pornographic.[30]

Glasgow City Council countered this by arguing that the funding granted to PHACE West was for the purpose of preventing the further transmission of HIV/AIDS, and that the organisation was not promoting homosexuality. The council also emphasised that the Scottish Parliament had recently passed the Ethical Standards in Public Life etc. (Scotland) Act 2000, which would consequently repeal Section 28.

However, two months later, Strain dropped the case after reaching an agreement with the council. Under the agreement, Glasgow City Council was required to include a covering letter to grant recipients, stating that "You will not spend these monies for the purpose of promoting homosexuality nor shall they be used for the publication of any material which promotes homosexuality."[31]

Political response

[edit]
Demonstrators in the Netherlands protest Section 28 during a state visit by Elizabeth II to the country, 1988

The introduction of Section 28 served to galvanise the disparate British LGBT rights movement into action.[32][33] The resulting protest saw the rise of now famous groups like Stonewall,[34] started by, amongst other people, Ian McKellen and Michael Cashman, and OutRage!.[34] Schools Out was formed in 1974 (as The Gay Teachers Association)[35] and campaigned against the act, as well as supporting teachers on how to counter homophobia in schools.[35] Many other groups not directly associated with LGBT rights also wanted the legislation removed, such as Gingerbread (a charity for single parents), the Family Planning Association and the Terrence Higgins Trust.[25] Many in the labour movement and trade unions also opposed the legislation.[36] A demonstration took place in Manchester led by John Shiers against Section 28 in 1988 with 25,000 people attending.[37]

The issue began to divide the Conservative party, heightening divisions between party modernisers and social conservatives.[38] In 1999, Conservative leader William Hague controversially sacked frontbencher Shaun Woodward for refusing to support the party line for Section 28's retention,[39] prompting pro-gay rights Conservatives, such as Steven Norris, to speak out against the decision. 2000 saw gay Conservative advisor Ivan Massow defect to the Labour Party in response to the Conservative Party's continued support of Section 28.[40] The Secondary Heads Association and NASUWT objected to repealing the legislation, saying that "it would be inappropriate to put parents and governors in charge of each school's sex education policy".[25]

Repeal

[edit]

Section 2A was repealed in Scotland under the Ethical Standards in Public Life etc. (Scotland) Act 2000 on 21 June 2000. While 2 MSPs abstained from the vote, a majority of 99 voted for the repeal of Section 28 and 17 voted against it.[41]

Although New Labour’s first attempt to repeal Section 28 in England and Wales was defeated following a campaign led by Baroness Young[42], backbench MPs introduced a new amendment to repeal the legislation as part of another Local Government Bill in early 2003. This amendment was supported by the government and was passed by the Commons in March 2003, with a majority of 368 to 76.[43] As the impact of organised opposition within the House of Lords diminished following the death of Baroness Young, the legislation was subsequently passed with a majority of 180 to 130 in July 2003.[44] The Local Government Bill received Royal Assent as the Local Government Act 2003 on 18 September 2003, and Section 28 was removed from the statute books.[45]

Despite this, Kent County Council produced its own school curriculum guidelines as the county’s “own form of Section 28.” The guidelines attempted to prohibit schools from “promoting homosexuality", while urging schools to emphasise the perceived importance of marriage and the nuclear family to their pupils.[46] The guidance distributed to local schools by Kent County Council was eventually quashed by the Equality Act 2010.

Support for Section 28

[edit]

Religious groups including, but not limited to, The Salvation Army,[47] the Christian Institute,[48] Christian Action, Research and Education,[49] and the Muslim Council of Britain, expressed their support for Section 28. The Conservative Party, despite dissent within its ranks on the issue, whipped its members in support of Section 28 in 2000, but in 2003, after further dissent from within the party, allowed a free vote. In the House of Lords, the campaign against the repeal of Section 28 was led by Baroness Young, who died in 2002. Newspapers that strongly supported Section 28 included The Daily Mail, The Sun and The Daily Telegraph.

In Scotland, the most visible supporters of Section 28 were Brian Souter and the Daily Record newspaper.

The main argument in support of Section 28 was to protect children from "predatory homosexuals" and advocates seeking to "indoctrinate" vulnerable young people into homosexuality. Various other arguments were also used in support of Section 28 which are summarised as follows:

  • That promotion of homosexuality in schools undermined marriage;
  • That Section 28 prohibited only the promotion, not the legitimate discussion of, homosexuality;
  • That Section 28 did not prevent the counselling of pupils who were being bullied;
  • Proponents also attempted to demonstrate that the general public was supportive of Section 28.[50][51]

Opposition to Section 28

[edit]
Activists target a bus operated by Brian Souter's Stagecoach company at a rally in Albert Square, Manchester, on 15 July 2000.[52]

Gay rights advocates, such as Stonewall, OutRage!, Capital Gay, The Pink Paper and the Gay Times formed the major opposition to Section 28 and led the campaign for its repeal. Prominent individuals who spoke out for the repeal of Section 28 included Sir Ian McKellen, Michael Cashman, Ivan Massow, Mo Mowlam, Simon Callow, Annette Crosbie, Michael Grade, Jane Horrocks, Michael Mansfield QC, Helen Mirren, Claire Rayner, Ned Sherrin and Alan Moore.[33]

A packed benefit held at the Piccadilly Theatre on 5 June 1988 called "Before the Act" mustered over 60 performers, among them Timothy West, Michael Cashman, Simon Rattle, Paul Eddington, Maureen Lipman, the Medici String Quartet, Pet Shop Boys, Maggie Ford, Sheila Hancock, Jill Bennett, Stephen Fry, Richard Griffiths, Harold Pinter, Joan Plowright, Antony Sher, Ned Sherrin and Ian McKellen.[53]

A coalition of comic book creators, including Alan Moore, Frank Miller, Robert Crumb, Art Spiegelman, Neil Gaiman, and many others, produced a comic anthology called AARGH and raised at least £17,000 to contribute to the fight against the legislation, according to Moore.[54] Boy George wrote a song opposed to Section 28, entitled "No Clause 28". The band Chumbawamba recorded a single entitled "Smash Clause 28! Fight the Alton Bill!" which was an attack on Clause/Section 28 and a benefit for a gay rights group; it also featured 12 pages of hand printed notes relating to gay rights. The legislation was also opposed by some religious groups and leaders, such as Richard Harries, Bishop of Oxford. Newspapers that came out in opposition included The Guardian, The Independent and The Daily Mirror.[55]

Political parties that were later opposed to Section 28 included the Labour Party,[55] (although at the time of the debate, Jack Cunningham for the Labour Front bench said the Labour Party did not oppose it) the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party. In the House of Lords the campaign for repeal was led by openly gay peer Waheed Alli. Perhaps the most famous act of opposition to Section 28 came when Shaun Woodward, a Conservative MP with a transgender sister, defected from the Conservative Party and his seat and joined the ruling Labour Party in opposition to the Conservatives' continued support of Section 28.

The main point of argument claimed by opponents of Section 28 was the complaint that it discriminated against homosexuals and bisexuals, and hence was an intolerant and unjust law. Various other arguments were also used against Section 28 which are summarised as follows:

  • That, by excluding homosexual support groups and appearing to prevent teachers from protecting victims of homophobic bullying, Section 28 was actually endangering vulnerable children;[56]
  • The claim that Section 28 made the assumption that homosexuals were inherently dangerous to children, implying an association between homosexuality, bisexuality and paedophilia, as obvious from the "predatory homosexuals" argument of the supporters of the law;[57]
  • Not only did Section 28 prevent the active promotion of homosexuality, but also it appeared to give a legal reason to oppose it in schools and other forums if necessary;[56]
  • The claim that Section 28 was a law which gave an impression to the public that the government sanctioned homophobia;[57]
  • The idea that homosexuality could be "promoted" implied that homosexuality was a choice which people could be persuaded to make, in contrast to the Section's opponents' view that homosexuality is biologically determined;[58]
  • It was no longer relevant due to the Learning and Skills Act 2000 and the Education Act 1996.[citation needed]

Legacy

[edit]
Rainbow plaque marking the location of protests against Section 28 in Victoria Gardens, Leeds

In 2012, when the Coalition government launched its consultation into legalising same-sex marriages, Harrow East MP Bob Blackman suggested that David Cameron should resurrect Section 28, stating that he strongly believed that "Section 28 was the right rules to have in school so that we should not promote in any way shape or form promote same-sex relationships" and said he would be "very opposed" to seeing teachers being forced to say same-sex relationships are equivalent to heterosexual relationships. Shortly after, Blackman's Labour predecessor Tony McNulty branded him a "complete idiot" on Twitter.[59]

In 2014, a Stonewall report on homophobic bullying in schools found that 37% of primary school teachers and 29% of secondary school teachers did not know if they were allowed to teach lessons on LGBT+ issues.[60]

In 2015, Pink News accused the Evangelical Alliance's report to the Women and Equalities Select Committee's transgender inquiry, which said in part that "children should be protected from having to sort through [questions regarding sex or gender] before they reach an appropriate age" as reminiscent of Section 28.[61]

After the Women and Equalities Select Committee recommended updating the Gender Recognition Act 2004 away from a medicalised approach and towards one based on statutory declarations in 2016, the ensuing and ongoing debate raised fears among some trans people that a new Section 28 could be introduced, especially after equalities minister Liz Truss said that government policy would be based in part on the principle "that the under 18s are protected from decisions that they could make, that are irreversible in the future."[62][63][64] LGBT+ rights charity Stonewall stated that the government rhetoric "sounds similar to how young lesbian, gay and bi people were spoken about in the 1980s."[65]

In 2016, research by Janine Walker and Jo Bates found that Section 28 still had a lasting effect on school libraries, with very little LGBTQ+ literature available or support from librarians being given.[66] Later in 2019, John Vincent said that through his research he still met British librarians who assumed Section 28 was still in place.[67]

A 2018 study from Anglia Ruskin University found that only 20% of LGBT+ teachers who had taught under Section 28 were openly LGBT+, whereas almost 90% of those had been trained after the repeal of the law were. The study additionally found that 40% of the teachers from the Section 28 era saw their LGBT+ identity as incompatible with their role as teachers, whereas only 13% of the post-Section 28 era teachers did.[68]

Academies

[edit]

Section 28 received renewed attention in late 2011, when Michael Gove, in Clause 28 of the Model Funding Agreement for academies and free schools, added the stipulation that the benefits of marriage be taught in schools.[69] Although the clause does not explicitly mention sexual orientation, with same-sex marriage not being legal at the time, it prompted The Daily Telegraph (traditionally supportive of the Conservative Party) to draw comparisons between the two clauses.[70]

Academies and the Department for Education came under greater scrutiny in August 2013, when LGBT activists, in co-ordination with the British Humanist Association (BHA), identified over forty schools whose policies either replicated the language of Section 28 in their sex and relationship education (SRE) policies or were "unhelpfully vague" on the issue.[71] Several of the schools highlighted by the BHA included the Evelyn Grace Academy chain of faith schools – which opened after the repeal of Section 28, Tasker-Milward V.C. School, whose SRE policy, dating from 2008, implied the clause was still in force, and The Northumberland Church of England Academy, who was listed as a School Champion by LGBT rights charity Stonewall and whose staff spoke at Stonewall's 2013 Education for All Conference.[72] In light of the media coverage, the Welsh Government announced an investigation into the Tasker-Milward School,[73] and the Department for Education, announcing its own investigation, stated that schools were prohibited under DfE guidance from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.[74]

Cultural depictions

[edit]

Margaret Thatcher Queen of Soho (2013), a drag comedy musical play, displays what life would have been like if Margaret Thatcher had got lost in Soho on the eve of the vote for Section 28. It was produced in December 2013 by Jon Brittain, Aine Flanagan, Matt Tedford at Theatre503 in London.[75]

Next Lesson (2015) is a comedy drama written by Chris Woodley which explores Section 28 in a fictional South East London school from 1988 to 2006. The play was first performed at The Pleasance Theatre, London in 2015. To mark the thirtieth anniversary of Section 28 a new production was staged at Above The Stag Theatre London in August 2018. A staged reading was also performed in The House of Lords by The BRIT School in June 2018.[citation needed]

Russell T. Davies included a scene in the TV series Queer as Folk (1999) with a classmate of the gay schoolboy Nathan stopping a teacher discussing an author's sexuality with "You can't teach us about poofs. You're not allowed." He referenced it again in It's A Sin (2021), where gay schoolteacher Ash is ordered to remove books from the school library which reference homosexuality, following the introduction of the law in 1988.[76]

The Outrage (2021) by British author William Hussey is a dystopian novel set in future England, overtaken by a far-right government which prosecutes LGBT people. The government gets its power to do so from a fictive law called Section 28, named after the 1988 law.[77]

Blue Jean (2022) depicts the struggles of a young lesbian teacher in the north east of England as she comes to terms with her sexuality against the background of the passage of Clause 28 in 1988.[78]

See also

[edit]

Explanatory notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ "Local Government Act 1988". Retrieved 22 October 2024.
  2. ^ "Public Attitudes To Section 28". Ipsos. 1 February 2000. Retrieved 22 October 2024.
  3. ^ "Section 28 (2A in Scotland) 1988-2000". www.ourstoryscotland.org.uk. Retrieved 29 October 2024.
  4. ^ "Section 28: impact, fightback and repeal". The National Archives. Retrieved 22 October 2024.
  5. ^ "Knitting Circle 1989 Section 28 gleanings". Archived from the original on 18 August 2007. Retrieved 1 July 2006.
  6. ^ a b Greenland, Katy; Nunney, Rosalind (20 November 2008). "The repeal of Section 28: it ain't over 'til it's over". Pastoral Care in Education. 26 (4): 243–251. doi:10.1080/02643940802472171.
  7. ^ "The 20th anniversary of the repeal of section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988". House of Commons Library. Retrieved 22 October 2024.
  8. ^ "The 20th anniversary of the repeal of section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988". House of Commons Library. Retrieved 22 October 2024.
  9. ^ a b c Lee, Catherine (2023). Pretended: Schools and Section 28. Historical, cultural and personal perspectives. Melton, United Kingdom: John Catt Educational Ltd. p. 92. ISBN 978-1915261694.
  10. ^ "Sexual Offences Act 1967", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, 1967 c. 60
  11. ^ "Regulating sex and sexuality: the 20th century". UK Parliament. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
  12. ^ Gallo RC (2006). "A reflection on HIV/AIDS research after 25 years". Retrovirology. 3 (1): 72. doi:10.1186/1742-4690-3-72. PMC 1629027. PMID 17054781.
  13. ^ "Timeline of The HIV and AIDS Epidemic". HIV.gov. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
  14. ^ "The History of AIDS and ARC" at the LSU Law Center
  15. ^ Herek, GM; Capitanio, JP; Widaman, KF (March 2002). "HIV-related stigma and knowledge in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1991–1999". American Journal of Public Health. 92 (3): 371–7. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.3.371. PMC 1447082. PMID 11867313.
  16. ^ Clements, B.; Field, C. D. (1 June 2014). "Public Opinion toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights in Great Britain". Public Opinion Quarterly. 78 (2): 523–547. doi:10.1093/poq/nfu018. ISSN 0033-362X.
  17. ^ a b Jones, Carol; Mahony, Pat, eds. (1989). Learning our lines: sexuality and social control in education. London: Women's Press. ISBN 978-0-7043-4199-9.
  18. ^ Labour and the Left in the 1980s. Manchester University Press. 1 February 2018. doi:10.7228/manchester/9781526106438.001.0001. ISBN 978-1-5261-2093-9.
  19. ^ Buckle, Sebastian Charles. "Homosexual Identity in England, 1967-2004: Political Reform, Media and Social Change" (PDF). Retrieved 25 October 2024.
  20. ^ Davis, Glyn (2 January 2021). "'Gay Sex Kits': Lessons in the History of British Sex Education". Third Text. 35 (1): 145–160. doi:10.1080/09528822.2020.1861872. ISSN 0952-8822.
  21. ^ a b Moran, Joe. "Childhood Sexuality and Education: The Case of Section 28". Sexualities. 4 (1): 73–89.
  22. ^ "Education (No. 2) Act 1986". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
  23. ^ "Local Government Bill (Hansard, 16 February 1988)". api.parliament.uk. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
  24. ^ "PROHIBITION ON PROMOTING HOMOSEXUALITY BY TEACHING OR BY PUBLISHING MATERIAL (Hansard, 15 December 1987)". api.parliament.uk. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
  25. ^ a b c "Section 28: An overview". BBC News. 25 July 2000. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  26. ^ Biddulph, Max. "Sexualities Equality in Schools: Why Every Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Transgender (LGBT) Child Matters". Pastoral Care in Education. 24 (2): 15–21.
  27. ^ "NUT on the Web". web.archive.org. 25 December 2004. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
  28. ^ "Section 28: impact, fightback and repeal". The National Archives. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
  29. ^ Brian Deer, Schools escape clause 28 in 'gay ban' fiasco (Sunday Times).
  30. ^ "Council halts gay group cash". BBC News. 14 May 2000. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
  31. ^ "Gay groups claim court victory". BBC News. 6 July 2000. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
  32. ^ Gillan, Audrey (17 November 2003). "Section 28 gone ... but not forgotten". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 February 2016.
  33. ^ a b Godfrey, Chris (27 March 2018). "Section 28 protesters 30 years on". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
  34. ^ a b "When gay became a four-letter word". BBC. 20 January 2000. Retrieved 4 January 2010.
  35. ^ a b "About Us". Schools Out. Retrieved 22 May 2015.
  36. ^ "Solidarity and Sexuality: Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners 1984–5". Oxford History Workshop Journal, Volume 77, Issue 1 (Spring 2014), pp. 240–262.
  37. ^ Mottram, David (2012). "John Shiers obituary". Guardian. Guardian. Retrieved 22 September 2019.
  38. ^ Monahan, Martin (11 December 2018). "'Tory-normativity' and gay rights advocacy in the British Conservative Party since the 1950s". The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 12 (1): 140–141. doi:10.1177/1369148118815407. S2CID 150298734.
  39. ^ "Tory MP sacked over gay row". BBC. 3 December 1999. Retrieved 4 January 2010.
  40. ^ "Tory adviser defects to Labour". BBC. 2 August 2000. Retrieved 4 January 2010.
  41. ^ "BBC News | SCOTLAND | MSPs abolish Section 28". news.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 29 October 2024.
  42. ^ Langdon, Julia (7 September 2002). "Obituary: Lady Young of Farnworth". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 May 2015.
  43. ^ "The Public Whip — Local Government Bill — Maintain Prohibition on Promotion of Homosexuality (Section 28) - 10 Mar 2003 at 19:29". www.publicwhip.org.uk. Retrieved 29 October 2024.
  44. ^ "Section 28 to be repealed". 18 September 2003. Retrieved 29 October 2024.
  45. ^ "Stonewall". web.archive.org. 17 April 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2024.
  46. ^ "Kent votes for its own Section 28". The Independent. 21 July 2000.
  47. ^ "Salvation Army Letter to Scottish Parliament". Archived from the original on 31 January 2011. Retrieved 6 September 2011.
  48. ^ "Section 28: Briefing Paper". Christian Institute. Archived from the original on 4 August 2015. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  49. ^ Merrick, Jane (30 March 2008). "Right-wing Christian group pays for Commons researchers". Independent. London. Archived from the original on 24 November 2009. Retrieved 22 March 2012. CARE connections (list of MPs)
  50. ^ "Poll supports S28 retention". BBC. 30 May 2000. Retrieved 4 January 2010.
  51. ^ Braunholtz, Simon (21 January 2000). "Public Attitudes (In Scotland) To Section 28". Ipsos MORI. Sunday Herald. Archived from the original on 23 November 2007.
  52. ^ "FindArticles.com - CBSi". findarticles.com.
  53. ^ "Before The Act Podcast". Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  54. ^ "Blather: The Alan Moore Interview: Brought to Light - deep politics / AARGH". blather.net. 16 November 2013. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  55. ^ a b "Section 28 protesters 30 years on: 'We were arrested and put in a cell up by Big Ben'". The Guardian. 27 March 2018. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  56. ^ a b "Section 28 protesters 30 years on: 'We were arrested and put in a cell up by Big Ben'". the Guardian. 27 March 2018. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  57. ^ a b "Growing Up in Silence – A Short History of Section 28". twentysixdigital. 23 February 2021. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  58. ^ "UK Parliament". Hansard. 9 March 1988. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
  59. ^ "Tory MP Bob Blackman: Cameron should be re-introducing Section 28 not letting gays marry". 7 December 2012.
  60. ^ "The Long Shadow of Section 28".
  61. ^ O'Toole, Michelle (14 October 2015). "Parliament told to make 'new Section 28' to prevent kids learning about trans people". Pink News. Retrieved 14 October 2015.
  62. ^ "Liz Truss reveals 'shocking' plan to remove healthcare for trans youth". 23 April 2020.
  63. ^ "Section 28 may be long-repealed but it doesn't feel like that for trans people". 10 February 2021.
  64. ^ "I'm a trans woman who grew up under Section 28 - I worry it could comeback". 11 May 2020.
  65. ^ Russell, Laura (23 April 2020). "Why we're worried about the Government's statement on trans rights legislation". Stonewall. Retrieved 21 October 2022.
  66. ^ Walker, Janine; Bates, Jo (2016). "Developments in LGBTQ provision in secondary school library services since the abolition of Section 28". Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 48 (3): 269–283. doi:10.1177/0961000614566340. ISSN 0961-0006. S2CID 36944979.
  67. ^ Vincent, John (2019). "Moving into the Mainstream: Is that Somewhere We Want to Go in the United Kingdom?". LGBTQ+ librarianship in the 21st century : emerging directions of advocacy and community engagement in diverse information environments. Bharat Mehra. United Kingdom. ISBN 978-1-78756-473-2. OCLC 1098173907.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  68. ^ "LGBT teachers who taught under Section 28 still 'scarred' report finds". 12 March 2019.
  69. ^ "Opening a free school". education.gov.uk. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  70. ^ "Free schools and academies must promote marriage". Telegraph.co.uk. 3 December 2011. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  71. ^ Nigel Morris (19 August 2013). "The return of Section 28: Schools and academies practising homophobic". The Independent. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  72. ^ "BHA identifies 45 schools that continue to have section 28-like policies". British Humanist Association. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  73. ^ Simon Gaskell (20 August 2013). "Tasker Milward section 28 investigation - Wales Online". walesonline. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  74. ^ "UK Government: No schools should be reintroducing Section 28". PinkNews. 19 August 2013. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  75. ^ "Margaret Thatcher Queen of Soho - Theatre503 Margaret Thatcher Queen of Soho - Book online or call the box office 020 7978 7040". theatre503.com. Archived from the original on 27 October 2013. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  76. ^ Davies, Russell T (January 2021). "Episode 4". It's A Sin. Channel 4.
  77. ^ Hussey, William (2021). The Outrage. Usborne Publishing Ltd. ISBN 9781474966184.
  78. ^ "Blue Jean: The lesbian teachers who inspired film about Section 28". BBC News. 10 February 2023. Retrieved 12 February 2023.

General and cited sources

[edit]
[edit]