Talk:Lok Sabha

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Restrictions placed: 8 June 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lok Sabha article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: Politics Top‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.
	This article was a past Indian Collaboration of the Month.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

June 2 to 8, 2024

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change Congress party win 99 Seat Shafin113 (talk) 16:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done INC (99) ~/AWBunny:<ping> 08:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seat Count

The current count of Congress seats in the is 99. However, there are 2 independent candidates who contested without any party symbol but were aligned with Congress during the election and received support from the party. Since they contested with Congress' backing, it seems more accurate to count them as part of the Congress tally. Secondly they are still members of Congress.

There should be a total of 101 for Congress, instead of 99. Including these 2 independent candidates as part of the Congress tally would provide a more accurate representation of the party's strength in the Lok Sabha.

Those 2 Independents are Pappu Yadav and Vishal Patil are members of INC, they are just refused to get tickets, they fought as independent.

Pappu Yadav recently campaigned for Congress in Jharkhand election, as a party worker he was given duty from the party.[1], [2], [3], [4], The party would have given him responsibility only if he was its member and these sources are saying the same. This year he merged his party with INC. [5], [6].

And Vishal Patil is grandson of former Congress Chief Minister, he was refused a ticket because of alliance, but still he is a member of Congress. [7], [8], [9]. the sources clearly showing that party crossed 100.

 ZDX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 05:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Whereas the link for the PDF document of "Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha", located in the infobox no longer works, please change the PDF link from "http://www.164.100.47.194/loksabha/rules/RULES-2010-P-FINAL_1.pdf" to "https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/2495198/1/Rules_of_Procedures_E_2019_16th_edition.pdf" (newer version of the Rules, from the Parliament Digital Library of the Government of India) Pr. M. (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Rainsage (talk) 02:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 November 2024 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Congress party (INC) have 99 members only not 101. It is a mistake in wikipedia for Loksabha page. And BJP have 241 members. AndTMC have 29 members. Sourav110899 (talk) 10:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Rainsage (talk) 02:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 November 2024 (3)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

change "Francis George" to "K. Francis George." Currently, the link leads to an American archbishop, not the Indian politician. Xshayarsha42 (talk) 20:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Rainsage (talk) 02:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]